HERE ARE 20 REASONS WHY THE MOON LANDING WAS FAKE
1.The likelihood of success was calculated to be so small that it is inconceivable the moon landings could have actually taken place.
2.Every Apollo mission before number 11 was plagued by about 20,000 defects apiece. Yet, with the exception of Apollo 13, NASA claims there wasn't one major technical problem on any of their Moon missions.
3.The poor video quality of the first moon landings was a deliberate ploy so nobody could properly examine it.
4.There can't be any pictures taken on the Moon because the film would melt in the 250° temperatures.
5.Every Apollo photograph appears to be perfectly composed, focused and exposed, despite the fact the astronauts used cameras without viewfinders and light meters.
6.The black sky should be full of stars, yet none are visible in any of the Apollo photographs.
7.The astronauts should have seen a beautiful star-filled sky above them, yet they never mention it.
8.There are several photographs of objects that are in shadows, yet they appear lighted and with surprising detail. Objects located in shadows should appear totally black.
9.In many photographs the shadow side of the astronauts appear illuminated, while the shadow side of rocks appear totally black.
10.Shadows cast on the lunar surface should be parallel. Some shadows in the Apollo photos are not parallel indicating more than one light source, thus the photos are fakes.
11.Apollo 11 footage shows the astronauts' shadows increasing and decreasing in length as they move about. This is because they are in close proximity to a large artificial light source that causes their shadows to change as they move toward or away from the light.
12.Many Apollo photographs show lighting "hot spots", as well as a darkening of the surface toward the horizon. Sunlight should not produce hot spots, nor should the surface fade in an airless environment.
13.Some Apollo photographs show mysterious lights in the shadowy background that appear to be studio spotlights.
14.Only two men walked on the Moon during each Apollo mission, yet there are photos in which the astronaut reflected in the visor has no camera. Who took the shot?
15.In an Apollo 11 photograph of Buzz Aldrin the horizon is located at eye level; however, if the camera was mounted to Neil Armstrong's chest, the horizon should be at chest level.
16.There is one photograph of an astronaut standing on the surface of the Moon in direct sunlight, yet he casts no shadow, which is impossible.
17.Not one still photograph matches the video footage, yet NASA claims both were shot at the same time.
18.If Neil Armstrong was the first man on the Moon, then who shot the video of him descending the ladder and taking his initial steps on the lunar surface?
19.Two photographs show an identical mountain background, yet in one the Lunar Module is present while in the other the LM is absent. The mountain scene must be an artificial backdrop.
20.Two video clips, claimed by NASA to have been taken at different locations many kilometers apart, show an identical hill.
all of this goes out to Victoria thanks for kicking me in the balls so hard
P.S. i will post 20 more reasons, but for now enjoy all this
| 
